Question of the Week # 14

Q14) A 46 y/o woman who is a school bus driver by occupation presents to your office for regular follow up. She has a history of  ADPKD. Her blood pressure is well controlled at 120/70 on enalapril. She has no other problems. She denies any headache. There is no family history of intracranial or subarachnoid hemorrhage. However, she is concerned that her head might explode because her sister who also has ADPKD was recently diagnosed of having a berry aneurysm. She wants to be screened for berry aneurysm as soon as possible. Her physical examination is benign and does not reveal any focal neurological deficits. Which of the following suggests the necessity for screening in her case?

A. Family history of berry aneurysm
B. Polycystic kidneys
C. School bus driving
D. Cysts in the liver
E. No screening necessary in her case

Copy Rights: Archer

9 Thoughts on “Question of the Week # 14

  1. Wasif Sheikh on August 3, 2010 at 3:30 pm said:

    A.

  2. ask2010 on August 8, 2010 at 6:35 pm said:

    A

  3. ask2010 on August 8, 2010 at 6:43 pm said:

    E: The sensitivity of renal ultrasonography for the detection of ADPKD is 100% for subjects 30 years or older with a positive family history. Diagnostic criteria require two or more cysts in one kidney and at least one cyst in the contralateral kidney in young subjects, but four or more in subjects older than 60 years because of the increased frequency of benign simple cysts. Most often, the diagnosis is made from a positive family history and imaging studies showing large kidneys with multiple bilateral cysts and possibly liver cysts. Before the age of 30 years, CT scan or T2-weighted MRI is more sensitive for detecting presymptomatic disease because the sensitivity of ultrasound falls to 95% for ADPKD type 1 and <70% for ADPKD type 2.Genetic counseling is essential for those being screened. It is recommended that screening for asymptomatic intracranial aneurysms should be restricted to patients with a personal or family history of intracranial hemorrhage. Intervention should be limited to aneurysms larger than 10 mm. Someone with this disease has a 5% chance of getting brain aneurysms.

  4. Manoj Dobariya on August 16, 2010 at 3:14 pm said:

    E. No screening necessary as she doesn’t have family history of intracranial hemorrage.

  5. Answer. C

    High risk jobs ( pilot, bus driver etc) is one of the indications to screen for berry aneurysm in asymptomatic ADPKD patients. Family hx of berry aneurysm (Ans. A) alone does not warrant screening for berry aneurysm in asymptomatic ADPKD patients. Asymptomatic ADPKD patients must be screened if there is a family history of “Ruptured” berry aneurysm ( history of SAH in the family etc)
    E. is not the answer because this patient is a school bus driver by occupation and needs to be screened.

    Key Concepts :

    Screening for Berry Aneurysms:

    - MRA of head – recommended screening test to detect berry aneurysms.

    - Screen only if
    - family history of subarachnoid hemorrhage ( Family hx of a ruptured berry aneurysm) not just a family history of berry aneurysm.
    - Patients with with high risk jobs (pilots/ bus-drivers) – an event during such a job is a risk to other’s safety as well.
    - Patients with symptoms suggestive of a berry aneurysm
    ( severe headache, focal neurological deficits)

  6. N.Isidore on June 29, 2011 at 9:34 pm said:

    thanks

  7. Guillermo on September 20, 2011 at 3:09 pm said:

    that was a good one

WordPress SEO fine-tune by Meta SEO Pack from Poradnik Webmastera
Freelance PHP Developer